GIVeconomy Working Group Proposal

[karmaticacid]

@mitch

However I’m curious if there are any costs such as servers, RPC endpoints, sub-graph, domains etc… that we are paying for to keep the GIVeconomy running.

I can work with Kay to include some of these costs in this proposal as well.

@mitch

I’m also curious by what you mean as “Build new products” - were you planning to build new products in the next 3 months?

Not planning, but none of this is my “plan” anyway. Some org may come to us and want us to build a new RegenFarm for them. Or fundraising may promise some chain integration for GIVbacks and GIVpower that will eventually fall on my plate. These things happen all the time, so we can either day “Sorry, GIVeconomy WG only does this much and no more” or we can include some buffer for the inevitable trickle down of work.

@mitch

Is project listing/unlisting and verification in the scope of the GIVeconomy working group?

I included it because it relates to GIVbacks and GIVpower, but it is already considered, I can remove it and reduce the budget.

@mitch

It would be helpful in subsequent proposals to understand if you need any budget in GIV to for example top up any rewards program such as GIVpower

I suppose, but is it really better to lump all of that data into one long and complicated forum proposal… or break it down? Consider the last GIV request for GIVpower… there are estimates of biweekly rewards, APRs, how these numbers are calculated… I’m not sure we should box all proposals under “WG scope” because it gets harder to digest and harder to make decisions on.