I’m not sure the WG proposal process as it is is efficiently/effectively meeting our goals. It’s great to have the retrospective & KPIs in one place, but it’s just honestly a huge amount of work to put together a good WG proposal, and it seems at least 50% wasted effort. In order for this to make sense:
- All WG proposals would need to be posted at the same time so they could be compared
- We’d need to have an additional explainer proposal outline projects we are still otherwise committed to completing, and an outline of the resources it is taking.
- We’d need also to have a clear outline of the developer/comms/PM resources that are available for other work
- We’d need a clear outilne of how much money we even have to spend on a season, and any other related prospects for funds coming in
The QF working group proposal for season 2 is here and while I think it’s really cool & interesting for everyone to be able to see some stats & info about what was done, I really think this process needs a lot of improvements for it to be effective.