I didn’t realize we decided the top 3 would all have foster, I’m not sure I like that word in this context - I’d propose an copy from the workshop with ‘design’ instead which I think is a nod to the technical parts of what we’re doing as well.
Our mission is to design a culture of giving to support and reward those who Give - to projects, to society and to the world.
Well… it would feel empowering to give to a cause thats building the future. And it would certainly be rewarding to watch how that future is created knowing I contributed. So i like the first one
I really like this mission. An argument for build: “create” suggests a one-time event, like a birth, whereas “build” implies an ongoing process, which is probably closer to the reality. I’m not sure on this, but the alliteration of the two hard "c"s with “create” also seems a bit of a tongue catcher, whereas the “b” of “build” seems to flow a bit better, no?
Also, maybe tweak the “to” to “that” to make it a bit more proactive. Thus:
Our mission is to build a culture of giving that rewards and empowers those who Give - to projects, to society and to the world.
In the forum for a total of 17 minutes, and already spouting my mouth off.
Ok, based on the comments above it looks like the real battle is between “build” and “create”… unless I’m missing something… Two options below for a vote!! And a third option in case you’re still not satisfied
Our mission is to create a culture of giving that rewards and empowers those who Give - to projects, to society and to the world.
Our mission is to build a culture of giving that rewards and empowers those who Give - to projects, to society and to the world.
Another option - leave your feedback in the comments!
I still think that we should say Our mission is to create a culture of giving, instead of build.
Build just doesn’t sound good. I know vote passed but I keep saying create instead of build
Yeahh… I love build - its in our tagline.
I went along because of the phrase “culture build” … stated my preference for create earlier in the thread so’s not to be redundant… but it seemed to be overruled and I complied there also!